|
Moral
Action Committee
6273 Miller Road
Swartz Creek, MI 48473
Executive Director:
Dr. Roy L. McLaughlin
Moral
Action Committee Report
Given
April 23, 2008
by
Dr. Roy L.
McLaughlin, Executive Director
There
is one thing that I often heard growing up in the Baptist
church my family attended in Dallas, TX that was just plain
wrong. It usually
went something like this, “Well now we’re Baptist and that
means we don’t get involved in anything controversial, we
just preach the gospel.”
I must tell you, a non- controversial gospel is an
oxymoron. As most
of you know an oxymoron is a seeming contradiction where you
take two seemingly contradictory descriptions and use them to
describe the same person place or thing, you know sort of like
“Humble Texan” or “Honest Politician”. Now that is an oxymoron.
It is just as much of an oxymoron to say we have a
non-controversial gospel.
The
gospel by its essence and nature is controversial and Jesus
makes that clear to us in the 5th chapter of the
gospel of Matthew. I
want you to notice beginning in verse one, “And
seeing the multitudes He went up into the mountains and when
He was set, His disciples came to Him and He opened His mouth
and taught them.”
Listen
to what He says in verse 13, “Ye
are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his
savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good
for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot
of men. Ye are the light of the world. A city that is
set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a
candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and
it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your
light so shine before men, that they may see your good works,
and glorify your Father which is in heaven.” Jesus
looks at a world that is in degeneration - that is in rot –
that is in spoliation and He turns to Christians and He says,
“you are to be the
salt of the earth.”
Now salt is first and foremost a preservative.
It does not make a dead thing a living thing.
But it does keep a dead thing from becoming a rotting
thing.
When
I travel I always carry with me a package of beef jerky.
Now there are two reasons for this.
One is as a native born Texan it is my patriotic duty
to eat some portion of a cow every day.
Second, no matter how much time I spend traveling, and
that package of beef jerky stays in my luggage, it’s not
going to spoil, it’s not going to rot.
Why? Because
it’s been cured with salt, it has salt rubbed into it so
that it’s not going to spoil the way regular meat would
spoil.
Jesus
is saying that we are to go out into a decaying world and we
are to be a preservative.
We are to stop the rot.
Stop the decay. Now salt is also a purifying agent. It’s a disinfectant. Now
we don’t use it for a disinfectant that much because it
stings and it burns and it irritates, but salt will purify a
wound. It will
kill infection.
Jesus
is commanding us to be a purifying agent and a preservative,
but you know, if the salt is over here and what needs to be
salted is over there, it doesn’t do any good.
We must be out in the world seeking to preserve and to
purify and then Jesus says we are to be the light of the
world. He says
let your light so shine before men that they may see your good
works and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
When I was a small boy we had a song we use to sing in
the children’s program “this little light of mine I’m
going to let is shine, hide it under a bushel “NO” I’m
going to let is shine.”
Now
our light, to be effective, has to be close enough to the
world that they can see the light and feel the heat.
Jesus looks at a world that is lost in darkness and
despair and He says you are to bring light you are to bring
illumination. But
the problem is men love darkness rather than light because
their deeds are evil. You
go shining light into dark places and pretty soon they are
throwing rocks at your light or they are trying to shoot out
your headlight because they love darkness rather than light.
Did
you know?
The trouble with our liberal friends is not that
they’re ignorant: It’s
just that they know so much that isn’t so, and they have
bought into “the darkness!”
Light
penetrates the darkness and illuminates the gloom - but salt
burns and stings and irritates.
When we go out into the world and we seek to be salt
and we seek to be light we’re going to burn and sting and
irritate the world. We’re
going to expose those who love darkness and they are going to
try to remove the salt and they are going to try to put out
the light. So we
are going to be controversial.
That’s why Paul says all who live Godly in Christ
Jesus will suffer.
If
you are not suffering somewhere for your witness for the Lord
Jesus Christ, then your witness for the Lord Jesus Christ is
not what it ought to be.
If you are not left out of some invitation list, if you
are not considered to be radical by somebody or some group in
your community, then your witness for the Lord Jesus Christ is
not what it ought to be.
Because if we are going to be obedient, we must be
willing to be salt and light.
Now
let’s talk about some very important issues.
Let’s talk about pornography.
Pornography I believe is the devil’s chosen weapon to
seek to destroy America. It’s a powerful weapon with the internet as its aid and
asset. Salt seeks
to stop this subterranean electronic river of emotional and
polluted slime that is oozing up like toxic waste into the
homes and hearts of Americans.
It is our job as believers to go out and seek to
eliminate the scourge of pornography, to keep it out of the
hands of children and adults, to restrict it, to do everything
we can to keep it from contaminating the hearts and the minds
of men and women.
On
the subject of abortion, “we have to stop the killing!”
We have to stop the killing of our unborn children.
We have aborted one third of all the babies conceived
in America over the last 35 years.
That’s one out of every three.
The Bible tells us that children are an inheritance
from God. America
is like the prodigal son.
We have taken the inheritance of our unborn children
and we’ve gone to a far city and there we have wasted that
inheritance in riotous living and now we are reduced like the
prodigal to feeding among the swine - for the husks of life.
The only hope for us as a nation is like the prodigal
to come to our senses and to stand up and to shake the filth
from ourselves and to return to our Father. God had a plan and God had a purpose for every one of those
babies that was aborted.
Have we aborted the next Billy Graham?
He could be 35 years old if his mother aborted him in
1973. Have we aborted the next Abraham Lincoln?
He could have 34 if his mother aborted him in 1974.
Have we aborted the girl that God was molding and
knitting and shaping in her mother’s womb to come forth and
to find the cure for cancer?
She could be 33 and out of medical school and embarked
on her research if her mother aborted her in 1975.
There is a one in three chance that this is precisely
what we’ve done, because we have aborted one third of our
babies. For the
last 35 years the most dangerous place an American can be is
in his or her mother’s womb between conception and birth.
May God help us!
God
is not going to bless a nation that aborts its babies.
Being salt is stopping the killing.
Being light is saying everybody is a somebody to God. God never created a nobody.
It
is so sad that we have in this country many church-going
people who understand that abortion is wrong and shouldn’t
be done. We have
many people who believe that pornography is wrong and people
should look at it, but they have been deeply deceived, they
have been misled by a liberal lie and misconstruction of the
first amendment that calls for the so called separation of
church and state. They
say you can’t legislate morality.
Nonsense.
Society
legislates morality all the time.
Laws against murder, laws against theft, laws against
rape, laws against slavery, and laws against racism are the
legislation of morality.
When we pass laws making murder and theft and rape and
slavery and racism illegal, we are not so much trying to
impose our morality on murderers and thieves and rapists and
slave owners and racists as much as we are trying to keep them
from imposing their immorality on their victims; because you
see murder, theft, rape, slavery, and racism is not between
consenting adults in private.
Somebody is doing something to somebody else against
“their will” and we have a right and an obligation to
protect those who are being victimized.
The same thing is true with abortion.
When we pass laws restricting abortion we are not
trying to impose our morality on a pregnant mother. We
are trying to keep a pregnant mother from imposing her
immorality on her unborn child.
John
Adams our second president said, “We have a government that
is designed only for a moral and a religious people.
It is inadequate for any other.”
Have
you ever wondered what the Ten Commandments would have looked
like if Moses had run them through the U.S. Congress?
Romans
13 states that God gave us government to punish those who do
evil and to reward those who do that which is right.
You take away from government the ability to get on the
side of right and against the side of evil and you’ve taken
away from government the one reason God gave us government in
the first place.
Now
may I give you some practical things you can do.
˙
Number one is pray.
“If my people,
which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and
pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then
will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will
heal their land.” II
Chronicles 7:14
˙
You need to be registered to vote.
And, you need to register everyone you know who has the
same core values and you need to vote.
May
I encourage you to practice Christian stewardship with your
vote. Most importantly, remember you are not the property of a
political party, you are the blood-bought property of the Lord
Jesus Christ.
˙
You need to get involved. Both parties in this country can use more help than all the
Christians that America can give them.
Get involved in the process.
Make a difference.
May
God bless you as you seek to honor Him in your moral/political
life. Let each of
us continue to pray for God to bless this nation.
Dr.
Roy L. McLaughlin,
Executive
Director of MAC
What
Is Meant By Separation Of Church And State?
One
of the most neutralizing issues of our day is that of
church/state separation.
The so-called law of separation between church and
state has been used by many opponents of the church and
religious community to restrict and reduce religious
activity to the narrow confines of church property.
Christian
ideas and lifestyles have been squelched by the myth of the
phrase “separation of church and state” being found in
the First Amendment.
It
is essential that church leaders understand what is really
meant by separation of church and state.
The concept of a secular state, that is, one separate
from the church, did not exist when the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights were being written.
When
the Constitution was completed at the Philadelphia
Convention in 1787, it contained no amendments.
The amendments known as the Bill of Rights were added
to the original Constitution as restraints on the federal
government.
The
First Amendment, which is perhaps the most well known,
guarantees, among other things, the freedom of religion and
speech. It
states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof.”
Notice
the separation emphasis in the First Amendment occurred
between the Congress (federal government) and any
establishment of religion.
This fact is magnified by offering a simple
definition to the primary words in the First Amendment.
The
word “Congress” has, from the beginning, been
interpreted to mean the federal branch of government.
The word “respecting” is defined as “having
anything to do with.”
“Establishment” has historically meant “government
support of a single church or government preference of one
Christian creed or denomination over another.”
James Madison defined “religion” as “the duty
we owe to our Creator.”
As
you can see, this amendment was designed to place
restrictions on the federal government and not the states.
It was meant to ensure the continuance of the
Biblical foundation and the religious liberties germane to
the founding fathers and the documents they penned.
You
will also notice that the words “church and state” are
not to be found in the First Amendment and the popular
phrase “wall of separation” is also absent from the
Constitution. These
are contemporary terms, and many Christians today are often
heard referring to “the time honored tradition of the
separation of church and state.”
Clearly, there is a misunderstanding of the issue and
the substance of the Constitution.
As
people understand the First Amendment in its historical
context, they can then understand how distorted this
amendment has become. The Supreme Court, by ignoring the historical context for the
First Amendment, has managed to nullify 300 years of true
American tradition and, in the process, the Court has
violated the law it was sworn to uphold.
This
has provided the impetus for the religious purge that has
continued to this day.
This “separation of church and state” has
provided the motivation for groups such as the ACLU who file
more than 6,000 suits each year.
The ACLU and other groups have successfully weakened
the moral and spiritual fiber of our nation.
Understanding
the facts regarding the First Amendment can certainly help
in the fight to turn this nation around.
As former President Reagan said, “The First
Amendment was given to provide freedom of religion, not
freedom from religion.”
As
Christians we should be concerned with the details of the
law and how it relates to us, but we should not be
sidetracked into a defensive lifestyle that wishes to comply
with non-existent terms such as “wall of separation”
between “church and state.”
What
we must do is major on what is really there within the First
Amendment. That
is, the guarantee of freedom of religion and the guarantee
that the federal government will leave the church alone in
the proclamation of the faith and the exercise of free
speech. In
addition, we must protect our freedom to express our
religious viewpoint.
Do’s
and Don’ts of Political Activity for Churches and Pastors
Pastors
are concerned about the legal effects of political activity
on themselves and their churches.
Churches are exempt from federal tax so long as they
do not participate in political campaigns.
Federal election law also places restrictions upon
political activity by individuals and institutions,
particularly corporations, both profit and non-profit.
The scope of proper political activity varies from
case to case, but the following do’s and don’ts are
applicable.
Voter
Registration
Pastors
and churches
may engage in non-partisan voter registration activities,
since such activity is not considered political for tax or
election law purposes, unless an attempt is made to register
only voters of a particular party.
“Political”
or “Electoral” Activities
A
pastor may individually, or personally, endorse candidates
for political office.
A
church may not endorse candidates for political office, and
a pastor may not endorse candidates on behalf of his church.
A
pastor’s personal endorsement may be made from the pulpit
if it is made clear that it is his personal view and not
that of the church itself.
A
pastor may allow his name to be used as a supporter of a
candidate in the candidate’s own political advertisements.
In this connection, the pastor may be identified as
pastor of a particular church.
(Not very wise – RLM)
Churches
may engage in non-partisan voter registration and voter
education activities so long as such activities are not
intended to benefit any political candidate or party.
A
church may allow political candidates to speak on church
premises on the same basis that civic groups and other
organizations are allowed.
A
candidate should not be allowed to appeal to a church
congregation at a church service for support or funds to be
used in his political campaign.
Lists
of members of the church congregation may be provided to
candidates for use in seeking support or raising funds only
on the same basis that such lists are made available to
other individuals and organizations.
If a charge is normally made for such a list, the
candidate should pay the same amount. No favoritism should be shown among candidates in providing a
list of congregation members.
(Not very wise – RLM)
A
“church” may not establish a “political action”
committee.
“Pastors
and other like-minded individuals” may establish a
political action committee, but care should be taken that
the committee is separate from the church.
Meaning, the committee should not be named the “churches”
political action committee.
A name like “Concerned Citizens for Morality” or
the “Moral Action Committee of (your city)” should be
chosen.
“Legislative”
Activities
A
church may not engage in “substantial” legislative (as
opposed to electoral) activities.
The substantiality of legislative activities is
usually measured by reference to church expenditures.
Expenditures of less than 5% of an organization’s
total budget are generally not considered substantial.
A
church may give its mailing list to a legislative
organization (lobby) on the same basis that such a list is
made available to other organizations.
If a legislative organization is given more favorable
terms for receiving a mailing list than other organizations,
the cost of the list would be considered a legislative
expenditure.
A
pastor may engage in lobbying activities in his individual
capacity without adversely affecting the tax-exempt status
of his church.
|